| Author
|
Topic: Slayer Case
News |
Empty Cross
A translucent memory of what once was - Everything
you never wanted to be
|
posted 22 August 2001 06:01
HERE
Doesn't anyone grieve anymore or do they just fucking sue
someone?
--------------------
COOL
ART MissB Haven's Hand Crafted Jewellry METAL FLAKES
***********************************
Posts:
548 | From: The forbidden place in the back of your
mind | Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 38 |
Status: Defender | IP: Logged
| |
|
|
Pneumatic
Fingers Overhead the
night squad glides
|
posted 22 August 2001 07:11
I don't
care how old they were at the time, those three bastards
should not be alive today. And perhaps if they were put to
death, then the parents of that poor girl may have the closure
they seek. And if the parents and or their lawyers are just
doing this for money, then they need to be slapped in prison
with those three bastards.
[ 22 August 2001: Message edited by: Pneumatic Fingers ]
--------------------
"The mind can imagine The dark can deceive And here
on this night Together they weave"
Posts:
267 | From: PA, USA | Registered: Jun
2001 | Member # 31 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
|
|
|
|
Slayerkane
South Of Heaven
|
posted 22 August 2001 17:57
the last I
heard the case was dismissed. I guess not
[ 22 August 2001: Message edited by: Slayerkane ]
--------------------
Never let it be said that I gave my life for any cause, but
rather that I took advantage of my impending death.!!!
Posts:
589 | From: Delaware | Registered: Jun
2001 | Member # 106 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 22 August 2001 20:22
I think
people should be responsible for the actions they do and how
they influence people.
The kids clearly stated they were acting out what they
heard on the Slayer song.
Don't you think that we as a community should be working
together to make sure the influences we give the children of
our community are of a stable nature.
No parent can watch a child 24/7 365
Any parent wants to direct their children to the best
things in life, the best influences.
I think Slayer music sucks to begin with, but that's
another topic all together.
-Pangier
[ 22 August 2001: Message edited by: Pangier ]
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| |
yarmaluk
Avatar of the Inner Beavis
|
posted 22 August 2001 20:59
quote:
But Doug Odom, an investigator in the San Luis Obispo
district attorney's office who worked on the case from its
start, offers another, more disturbing theory. ''Basically,
I think they're evil little psychopaths,''
While I disagree with the idea of executing people who were
minors when they comitted their crimes, I think the above
quote sums it up. People don't commit murder because of music
they hear or books they read. They do it for other reasons,
such as they're psycohpaths (in which case they don't need any
particular external reason).
--------------------
To Hell .... take Route 666 straight to the end.
Posts:
70 | From: Oakland CA !! | Registered: Jun
2001 | Member # 45 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
|
|
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 22 August 2001 21:41
Not
everyone in the world is as stable as the next. We all
influence each other in many ways.
If you grew up around drugs, you were more likely to do
drugs. If you grew up around people who swore a lot, you
learned to swear too.
Don't give me this crap about how we're not responsible for
the people we influence. I'm not buying it.
Lets take it a step further. Would you let your children
hang with people who have low morals and are involved with
illegal conduct most of their lives. Answer me that..
I mean no disrespect here, but give me a break JVK, what
kind of crap are you reading that convinced you that
influences mean nothing.
-Pangier
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snxke
King of the Snakes...
|
posted 23 August 2001 00:59
quote:
Originally posted by Pangier: I think people
should be responsible for the actions they do and how they
influence people.
The kids clearly stated they were acting out what they
heard on the Slayer song.
Don't you think that we as a community should be working
together to make sure the influences we give the children of
our community are of a stable nature.
No parent can watch a child 24/7 365
Any parent wants to direct their children to the best
things in life, the best influences.
I think Slayer music sucks to begin with, but that's
another topic all together.
-Pangier
[ 22 August 2001: Message edited by: Pangier ]
Go back to communism you less than intelligent bastard.
People kill people, music does not.
It's because of people like you this case is even
happening.
--------------------
"Biting the BITCH on the back of the beast, buring desert
plains..."
My band page: http://www.thetruesyborg.cjb.net/
Posts:
31 | From: New Fucking York | Registered: Aug
2001 | Member # 729 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 23 August 2001 02:23
It amazes
me that people like Snxke can say that they are “open minded”
people and then throw power trip attitudes that are less than
“open minded”. You called me a communist? Amazing! So who's
the person dictating here? I'm just sharing my opinion. You
said; ”Go back to communism you less than intelligent
bastard..“ Snxke, either contribute to the debate with some
tangible context or get out of the ring. You’re not debating,
you’re name calling. When a person has run out of real context
to fuel his debate he will turn to name calling and swearing.
IOW: The first to lose his cool has lost the debate. Strike
one on you!
Nightcrawler, Thanks for your honest input. I do see your
point about passing all the blame on “just” songs or “just”
guns etc.. My main issue is that all of this is a contribution
and should share in the blame.
If a person gives drugs to a child, they didn’t shove it
down their throat, but you know what, If that child takes the
drugs, I believe the person that gave the drugs to the child
is partially responsible.
My point is that Influences are all around us and I believe
we should be just as responsible for how we influence people
as our own personal actions and decisions that affect our
lives.
You're absolutely right, we must give our children all the
right tools to make the right decisions. It's just that much
harder of a fight if we're conflicting with other influences
in the world. Why don’t we all have a common goal of making
the world better for children?
And to answer your question, I am not a parent by blood,
but I raised a beautiful little girl from birth that is now 10
years old.
-Pangier
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| |
Empty Cross
A translucent memory of what once was - Everything
you never wanted to be
|
posted 23 August 2001 03:37
I say the
responsibily lies mostly in the parents hands. It is true that
not everyone is as stable as others. But if the parents were
paying a little more attention they would recognize this and
seek help for the child. Did Slayer really influence these
youth? Only the kids know the truth about that - sounds to me
like they are looking for a way out of trouble. But if they
were/are that easily influenced then it could have been
anything that could have set them over the edge. Also these
kids are not being forced to be accountable for their own
actions. They may actually have the best parents in the
world. My parents are very religious and raised me not to
drink, do drugs, curse, and fornicate.
I do all of these things to one degree or another. Are my
parents to blame? I don't really think so - maybe they pushed
the "good living" thing a little too hard - and on that degree
they hold themselves responsible - too responsible IMO. Did
listening to Metallica, Slayer, Judas Priest, Ozzy, Sabbath,
Iron Maiden, Motley Crue, Van Halen, etc make me do these
things? No. I was a kid - I explored and experimented. I made
the choices. I have paid the price for the choices at times. I
personally think that the world is going to shit because
western civilization has found a way to make personal
accountability extinct.
--------------------
COOL
ART MissB Haven's Hand Crafted Jewellry METAL FLAKES
***********************************
Posts:
548 | From: The forbidden place in the back of your
mind | Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 38 |
Status: Defender | IP: Logged
| |
|
|
Twisted Tony
Old School Metalhead
|
posted 23 August 2001 04:36
"All three
came from seemingly ordinary families in this rural town of
43,000, located 110 miles north of Santa Barbara. Pals since
Paulding Middle School, Fiorella and Delashmutt continued
their friendship at Arroyo Grande High School, where they met
Casey, the son of custodian Cecil and housewife Rosalie. (The
Caseys declined to comment for this story.) The three even
formed their own metal band, Hatred, and met at Fiorella's
home nearly every weekend to play guitar and write songs. The
band, combined with their dark attire -- black T-shirts
emblazoned with ''Slayer'' and pentagrams -- led some
classmates to describe them as ''weird'' in interviews with
police at the time. Cops would later make much of the fact
that Fiorella -- perhaps not unlike many teens -- had 15
Stephen King novels, 20 posters of Slayer, Osbourne, and Iron
Maiden, and some drug paraphernalia in his bedroom."
I have read every Stephen King novel ever pulished and I
never thought about killing anyone. Ok maybe once, but I got
really stoned and passed out . Next thing you know they will
be going after him for a few bucks!!!
With all the evil shit I listen to, I should be Charlie
Manson!!! Lords knows I was always smoking pot when I was
listening to Reign In Blood. I should have killed half of NJ
by now. It all boils down to the fact that these guys all have
a coupla screws loose! The drugs didn't help the situation
either.
I want to ask you all a question. When was the last time
you saw a commercial for Slayer's next album on TV? When you
go to your local record store, do you see any Slayer posters?
How do you know when the next Slayer album is coming out? I
use to get all my info from metal magazines. Slayer as we all
know aren't mainstream marketable. The only way we get any
Slayer info is by word of mouth and [insert name of your
favorite Metal magazine]. Of course we can't forget our new
friend the internet! I don't see how they can blame the record
company. You don't see Slayer ads plastered all over the place
or on Nickaloden.
There defense is weak! But because of all the bullshit that
has happened over the past 10 years, I can see a jury siding
with plaintiff. Columbia is going to be shelling out some dead
presidents.
--------------------
Denim and Leather Brought us all together!!!
Posts:
214 | From: The Land Of The Metal Gods! Somewhere in
NJ | Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 29 |
Status: Defender | IP: Logged
| |
White Witch
Exciter
|
posted 23 August 2001 13:54
Night
Crawler, Powerzlave and I have had this conversation before
and we all agree that it is a parent's responsibility to know
what is influencing thier children and intervene when
necessary. We don't all agree on what is appropriate but that
should be left to each parent and their own values.
Pangier, while I respect your opinion, I must disagree with
you. I understand why you would feel that a band should be
responsible for the influences they send out to kids but
ultimately it is the parents responsibility to know what is
influencing thier children. It would be like blaming Budweiser
because a 15 year old drank themselves to death. Or Remington
because a 6 year old got ahold of Daddy's gun.
Unfortunately in this day and age it's more popular to have
the government pass laws to make industry more responsible
(ie. music warnings, TV and video game ratings) thus making
parents less responsible.
When you make a decision to become a parent, you must
realize that the ultimate responsibility for the safety and
welfare of that child begins and ends with you.
--------------------
I Don't Want the Village Raising My Child; Thier Values
Suck!
Posts:
205 | From: Long Island, New York | Registered:
Jun 2001 | Member # 90 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 23 August 2001 19:08
quote:
Originally posted by White Witch: Pangier, while
I respect your opinion, I must disagree with you. I
understand why you would feel that a band should be
responsible for the influences they send out to kids but
ultimately it is the parents responsibility to know what is
influencing thier children. It would be like blaming
Budweiser because a 15 year old drank themselves to death.
Or Remington because a 6 year old got ahold of Daddy's
gun.
Hmm.. Under your conditions, Charles Manson was not
responsible for the influences he had been on the "Manson
Family". And remember, these were not little kids he was
influencing.
-Pangier
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| |
Night Crawler
Hot & Spicy!
|
posted 23 August 2001 23:46
quote:
Originally posted by Pangier:
Hmm.. Under your conditions, Charles Manson was not
responsible for the influences he had been on the "Manson
Family". And remember, these were not little kids he was
influencing.
-Pangier
Allright Pangier, lets be fair about this. The "Manson
Family" were all drug addicts and were cohearced while under
the influence. I under any circumstances do not believe that
Charlie mentally guided those peole through their actions.
Like you said, they were all concenting adults, they simply
made horribly wrong decisions.
quote:
If a person gives drugs to a child, they didn’t shove it
down their throat, but you know what, If that child takes
the drugs, I believe the person that gave the drugs to the
child is partially responsible.
Of course there should be some blame on him, the bastard
has no right to give drugs to little kids. But, once again,
the ultimate responsibility falls on the parents, if that
little kid had been taught at home to never ever accept
anything from strangers or to never do drugs because they are
bad for you, chances are he or she would not do them and bring
the episode up to their parents so actions could be taken.
this is what I teach my children.
quote:
And to answer your question, I am not a parent by blood, but
I raised a beautiful little girl from birth that is now 10
years old.
well then, you know these things too. It is commendable to
raise someone elses child as your own, I salute you.
--------------------
-Night Crawler- Knightsx5@home.com
-or visit me at my webpage- NightCrawler.com
Posts:
189 | From: Molten metal foundries where the
Midlands sound unfurled! | Registered: Jun 2001 |
Member # 144 | Status: Defender |
IP: Logged
| |
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 24 August 2001 04:17
Sure,
Charles Manson was under a drug influence when he was with
these older kids talking them into doing the murders. It’s
also been a fact that many of the songs written today are drug
influenced. I think it’s unfair to debate this part of the
issue as I don’t want to blame the drugs for anyone’s actions
(That’s what we’re trying to get away from. The main complaint
here was that we should be putting people accountable for
their actions right?) So let’s put that drug issue aside.
Nightcrawler, As many people on this board, I really like
your personality. I admire the closeness of your family.
You’ve always displayed a very commendable and respectable
demeanor in your posts. I appreciate your replies to this
thread. I can tell that you do put time into them. So please
don’t take this the wrong way. I don’t mean for this to sound
condescending in any way. I’m just very curious about this
situation and way of thinking.
Why is it that people like yourselves claim to be so open
minded and yet you can’t get away from what society keeps
telling you? Many of the people on this board often repeat
what they hear without really thinking about it in depth.
Society keeps telling us that you may do anything you want as
long as it does not affect others.
Most people don’t want to get involved. “If it’s not
affecting me, who cares” right? Recently we’ve got policemen
on TV telling women to yell “Fire!” if they are being raped
rather than “Rape!”. The reasoning is because people don’t
want to get involved unless they themselves are in danger.
Yelling “Rape!” often caused people in the city to close their
blinds and ignore the situation. Yelling “Fire!” on the other
hand would get them to look out to see if they are in danger
or if any of their stuff was burning. Sad huh?.
I believe we should get more involved and care about what
goes on in society. I think I’ve proven to you that what we do
DOES affect others. The past thread discussion above would say
that we seem to agree that people do influence each other in
many ways.
Writing a song about killing virgin to please Satan is not
that far a jump from telling someone to do it. It’s actually
frighteningly close. If we can hold Charles Manson
responsible, why not others who influence our children? Is it
because of the lack of direct connection of them being in the
same room having direct contact?
Please fight the urge to think the same as you’ve always
believed just because it’s what you always have been taught or
heard from others. Think this out because it really deserves
an honest answer from your heart. Decide on situation because
of what you know about it rather than what everyone else tends
to think and say around you.
With that, let me expand upon this; We’re not just talking
about someone in a room telling someone to kill someone, we’re
talking about something these kids are hearing over and over
again in a song. Look at this correlation; We often see people
using meditation tapes which have phrases like “I am like a
rock, I will be the best I can be, today is the day I take a
hold of my destiny” etc. repeated over and over on them. These
tapes are used to “program” people/adults to be
stronger/better people. It is Scientific fact that this works
to program people if they listen to them enough. Most people
are strong enough to realize reality from fantasy when it
comes to their acting out on their thoughts. Are our children?
Are we as adults immune? – I think not.
Now realize the words these kids were listening to:
quote:
Altar of Sacrifice
..High priest awaiting dagger in hand Spilling the
pure virgin blood Satan's slaughter, ceremonial
death Answer his every command..
..A gift of
powers disposed upon you Use them when you feel the
need Master the forces and powers of Satan Controlling
the creature's instinct Drawn to the castles that float
in the sky Learn to resist the temptation Watching the
angels sift through the heavens Endlessly searching for
salvation
The song clearly states that a sacrifice of a virgin will
give immortal riches. Fantasy or not, this is what the kids
(in the court case) heard in the song.
My question is this: Is this freedom to use this context
without consequence a worthy trade off for the problems it
creates? Sure it just affects a family here and there. You’d
all probably think more firmly about this if the child killed
was a relative of yours.
And realize that these tragedies of death are only the
situations that we hear about. Many others go unreported or
acknowledged by the press. These situations affect many more
people than we can see. And just because a child does not kill
does not mean that he was not affected by what he has
experienced through music.
I know I’ve got a lot of you thinking. It’d be so easy to
just discount what I said and go on with your lives. (Heck,
it's a lot easier than going against the grain like I am). But
Just realize that if you’re wrestling with this issue, that’s
ok. I did wrestle with it myself and still do from time to
time. I sometimes wonder why I would listen to some songs when
my niece and nephew are in the car. I want to be a good
influence on them. Sometimes I fail.
When I was growing up in the 80’s I listened to a lot of
Judas Priest, Ozzy, Van Halen, Scorpions, Iron Maiden.. Well
the whole gambit of music of that day and age. I still listen
to a lot of it along with Rob’s new stuff (Though I stay away
from new priest ).
BTW:That’s why I’m here.
Although I never killed anyone I know I dove into things I
would never have because of the influence my music had on me.
I never got into Slayer, and that’s a good thing too. Although
I feel I am a stable adult today. When I was younger, I was
not. Who knows what would have happened if I listened to
stories of virgin sacrifice. I was already collecting skulls
of road kills and had a whole process of boiling the bones in
a big pot on the backyard BBQ grill. Although I don’t do
anything of that sort now-a-days, those actions were on
account of albums with skulls on them and me wanting people to
freak out when they saw my collection. I’m sure some of you
think those actions were quite off base. Then again, I’ll bet
some of you don’t.
My parents just thought I had a fascination of science and
skeletons. I was pretty messed up. Although I had a good close
relationship with my family/parents. I never did drugs, drank
or smoked, I still was warped in some areas of my life. I had
a very good middle class upbringing in the rich suburbs of
Chicago. The music I listened to DID influence me. You’d all
be lying to yourselves if you said that the music you listened
to didn’t influence you.
People DO influence people and people should be held
accountable for who they influence.
I’ve personally had enough of this theory that people are
not affected by others or parents should be the ONLY ones
accountable for their children’s actions. Everyone should be
held accountable. The parents have a big part of that but
EVERYONE means EVERYONE.
Please do not mistake this for me saying that parents are
not to blame. That is NOT what I am saying. In the gambit of
society, we as a community ARE responsible for what we do and
how we influence people. We’re just not HELD acountable for
those actions - That’s the sad part.
Parents need help to raise their chldren. We should all be
working towards a unified goal right?
I can tell you that this belief is my own because I have
wrestled with it inside my head. I want be a positive
influence on everyone around me – including adults. I am only
asking that you all think deeply about this and not take the
role of a puppet quoting something you heard over and over
from others over the years. That theory and way of life is a
trap. People that don’t think on their own are condemned to be
puppets.
One man can change a world. I’d like you to consider my
viewpoint. It makes more sense if you really look at the
reality of it. My view on this situation is so very crystal
clear to me. Again, All I ask is that you fight the urge to
think the same as you’ve always believed just because it’s
what you always have been taught or heard from others. Think
this out because it really deserves an honest answer from your
heart. Decide on what you know about this situation rather
than what everyone else tends to think and say. It only takes
a few to pass on the message.
Fair enough?
-Pangier
[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Pangier ]
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| |
Sad Wings
|
posted 24 August 2001 05:52
Pangier, I
agree with most of what you said. Although, I do not agree
that Slayer should have to take responsibility. As a society,
our collective choices have fostered this environment. Just as
there are influences from the musician to the fans, so too are
there influences from society to the musician. We talk of
passing the buck from the perpetrator to the musician, but for
some reason end up stopping that buck from further being
passed on to society as a whole. Why ? Because of a lack of
ability as an entire society to recognize the true inherent
problems. While I agree that parenting is paramount to
improving things, the situation is 'vastly' more complex than
that. You have touched on some aspects of that complexity that
most people usually don't recognize. For one, taking a
defensive stance by preparing your children for facing
problems in the world is very important. However, there is a
larger (currently very out of reach) aspect that involves what
you mentioned. You ask "Why don’t we all have a common goal of
making the world better for children?". Very simple. It is far
beyond our capabilities, to not only identify the roadblocks
to get there, but to also make it happen. Let's face it, we
can make nukes, but we can't protect our children.... from
ourselves.
I don't believe that rules and laws are what will save us
from ourselves. In fact, I think they only make the problems
more complex, and serve as a distraction from what is really
important. Self governance is the key. Until every single
person can do (or better yet, is 'capable' of doing) things
for the betterment of this world without having been told to
do so, without having been given a list of things 'not' to do,
without being given a lecture, without being given a list to
follow, or even pointed the way, etc.. the problems will
continue. And people will continue to bicker over ethics,
morals, laws, personal liberty, responsibility, etc...
For now, there has to be a governing body called the
government that dishes out in nice little bite size pieces,
the laws, regulations, freedoms, etc.. The laws that this
governing body comes up with, seems to cover all the bases,
yet each new day's newspaper tells another story. There is
also a charge for this service of course, unless you are into
tax evasion.
----------------------------- Sad Wings that heaven
sent wipes out in rage All Guns, All guns Blazing !!
[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Sad Wings ]
Posts:
4 | From: Around here somewhere | Registered:
Jun 2001 | Member # 251 | Status: Grinder
| IP: Logged
| |
Pneumatic
Fingers Overhead the
night squad glides
|
posted 24 August 2001 05:56
The
problem, Pangier, is that in this country we have a freedom of
speech. Exactly what kind of speech is hotly debated and
contested, but nevertheless the freedom is there. The real
truth is that there are countless upon countless books with
words and ideas worse than a Slayer song. Heck, the daily
newspaper contains stuff often more graphic than that.
Once you find a song as being solely responsible for a
death, then what do we do? Where is the line drawn? Is the
record company responsible for signing Slayer and producing
the album? Are the bands that influenced Slayer responsible
too? Are the drum, guitar and microphone manufacturers that
made the instruments used to record the song now held
responsible? Are the clubs and arenas that hosted Slayer
concerts during the 80's now responsible for this girl's
death? The stores that sold the album, clearly they are
responsible, right? The magazines and authors that wrote about
Slayer, the T-shirt makers, the guy who drew the album cover
and on and on and on, are they all accountable for this girl's
death? It sounds extreme and absurd, and that's mostly because
it is.
Once you find any song as being the sole, motivating factor
for a murder you suddenly have millions upon millions of
texts, books, tapes, movies, recordings etc. that have to be
censored or removed entirely. Suddenly expression becomes very
muted and the laws and beliefs that our country were founded
on become meaningless. You stated yourself that you enjoyed
Maiden, Priest, Ozzy, etc. well, there wouldn't be any of
that. This message board would have to be removed too, because
I've seen and read things on boards like this one with stuff
as bad or worse than what was in that Slayer song.
In a world filled with potential dangers, the best we can
do as people is prepare our youngsters with knowledge and
understanding and, most importantly, love and respect. The
majority of the problem with troubled teens today is that they
don't respect their parents. And that's mostly because those
parents don't give a damn about their kids, except when it's
too late. And that is the saddest thing of all.
Yes, your argument is very correct "people influence
people." And the biggest influence comes from the family,
because it's the first one we get.
[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Pneumatic Fingers ]
--------------------
"The mind can imagine The dark can deceive And here
on this night Together they weave"
Posts:
267 | From: PA, USA | Registered: Jun
2001 | Member # 31 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 24 August 2001 06:28
quote:
Sad Wings wrote: However, there is a larger
(currently very out of reach) aspect that involves what you
mentioned. You ask "Why don’t we all have a common goal of
making the world better for children?". Very simple. It is
far beyond our capabilities
I never say never Again, One man CAN change the
world. It's been done before. All it takes is a new
perspective. Time will finally bring us to the point where we
have to do something to control this. Necessity is the mother
of all invention. If things go as they have been, this change
will become necessity.
quote:
Sad Wings wrote: Self governance is the key
I strongly disagree, We've been trying self-governance all
along and the only thing that has worked is accountability.
quote:
Pneumatic Fingers wrote: Once you find a song as
being solely responsible for a death, then what do we do?
I never said that any ONE source should be responsible for
a murder.
If freedom of speech does not allow one to yell "fire" in a
crowded theatre, why can't it also be said that you're not
allowed to encourage people to murder?
If you're present while a murder is done and you do not
participate in any way, you are still an accomplice. Governed
by your actions (or lack there of).
It's not such a far jump. Follow my lead.
-Pangier
[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Pangier ]
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| |
Sad Wings
|
posted 24 August 2001 06:43
quote:
One man can change the world. It's been done before.
As a leader, or an example, or even an orginator of a
prespective, yes, entirely possible. However, due to the
nature of the problem, it will have to be faced as an entire
society.
quote:
All it takes in a perspective. Time will finally bring us to
the point where we have to do something to control this.
Necessity is the mother of all invention. If things go as
they have been. This change will become necessity.
Indeed.
quote:
I strongly disagree, We've been trying self-governance all
along and the only thing that has worked is accountability.
Oh yes, given the current level of development in humanity,
I agree, self governance is not anywhere near being
'currently' possible. I also don't foresee this happening any
time soon. However, you've said it yourself, never say never.
Accountability is just an interim solution, 'and', it is not
very effective. Just read your daily newspaper. Murder is a
very accountable offense, yet the numbers seem to rack up
quite well anyway. Necessity of invention will apply here.
----------------------------- Sad Wings that heaven sent
wipes out in rage All Guns, All guns Blazing !!
[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Sad Wings ]
Posts:
4 | From: Around here somewhere | Registered:
Jun 2001 | Member # 251 | Status: Grinder
| IP: Logged
| |
Pneumatic
Fingers Overhead the
night squad glides
|
posted 24 August 2001 07:17
quote:
Originally posted by Pangier:
why can't it also be said that you're not allowed to
encourage people to murder?
So a song about a virgin sacrifice encourages murder? Get
ready to ban or abolish a great deal of the world's texts
then. And whatever you do, don't read the Old Testament. A
song about somebody who cheats on their wife encourages
somebody to go out and commit adultery? Therefore it's the
songwriters fault and not the people who committed adultery. A
song about stealing or running away from home can't be
allowed? I guess listening to "Breaking the Law" now becomes
illegal.
The point I was trying to make is that once one song gets
singled out, either as the sole reason or partial reason even,
then you can easily find influences/blame for everything that
goes on in the world. Cookie monster goes ballistic and eats
tons of cookies on Sesame Street. So all parents of overweight
children should sue the Children's Television workshop because
Cookie Monster is a big influence? Like I asked previously,
where do we draw the line?
After you make the assumption that Slayer encouraged the
murder, then you can't stop there. All of these other things
must be held accountable in some form or other.
[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Pneumatic Fingers ]
--------------------
"The mind can imagine The dark can deceive And here
on this night Together they weave"
Posts:
267 | From: PA, USA | Registered: Jun
2001 | Member # 31 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
White Witch
Exciter
|
posted 24 August 2001 14:12
Pangier, I
understand your logic but I still can't agree. The only people
that are truly responsible for this incident are the kids that
commited it and the parents for not paying enough attention to
see it coming. If you study any of these cases in depth, which
most people don't, you will find that the kids that commit
crimes like this are not fine, outstanding citizens that just
snapped. They are kids that have a history of trouble and
violence.
The children that commit these atrocious acts are mentally
or emotionally unbalanced to begin with. Millions of kids
listen to the exact same lyrics and lead normal lives and grow
into responsible adults. Which I consider myself one of. You
cannot censor a medium that reaches millions because of the
actions of a few.
I did exstensive research on this subject and I can tell
you that studies show that heavy metal music does not cause
children to commit acts of violence but listening to heavy
metal is an indicator that a child may become violent. It's a
symptom, not a cause. So censoring the music is not going to
stop the violence but it will prevent the millions of people
who use it as a cathartic release.
--------------------
I Don't Want the Village Raising My Child; Thier Values
Suck!
Posts:
205 | From: Long Island, New York | Registered:
Jun 2001 | Member # 90 | Status: Defender
| IP: Logged
| |
Night Crawler
Hot & Spicy!
|
posted 25 August 2001 02:14
Well
Pangier, I must admit, you present a convincing case. And your commitment and
passion is commendable.
I realize the world as we know it is going right down the
perverbial toilet. And society is has gone haywire! I really
do wish things were different and that we didnt have to arm
our children with as much amunition as we do, but Im afraid
its just not going to change. As a matter of fact, Im afraid
its going to get worse! For the ideas and perspective you talk
about to work we would all have to collectively believe and
follow the same plan. Unfortunately everyone has a hidden
agenda. We all have different perspectives about how things
should be. Granted, I think everyone wants the world to be a
better place, but in many many different ways.
I will agree that the world around us influences us to a
certain degree every day. How could it not? But I do believe
that the human brain is capable of blocking out anything that
it wants. I am a firm beleiver in mind over matter. I cant
really tell you if this is an ideal that I have formed on my
own or if it was instilled in me as a child by the folks who
raised me. But I would like to beleive that it is my own. You
raised a good point about following others opinions and
ideals. And to some degree I believe we are all guilty of that
in one way or another. From wanting what we see on TV to being
influenced by our friends to do something we probably shouldnt
have done. Its part of life, part of a life long learning
experience. Learning what is right or wrong through trial and
error. But, I beleive we all have it in us to just say no!
LOL, I know that sounds funny, and we all have heard it a
thousand times but its absolutly true! we have the power to
control our own destiny. If we let negative influence into our
lives its because we want it there. Plain and simple.
Im not going to try to get all patriotic here but this
country was founded on freedom. and we have so many more
rights and privaliges than many other countries. One of the
most important rights we have is freedom of speech. While we
have pushed the boundries of this right for hundreds of years,
it is still in tact. Beleive me, I think the lyrics of the
Slayer song in question are indeed corrupt and just plain
appauling. But there are warning labels on CD's that warn of
explicit language and themes. Unfortunatly Slayer has every
right under our constitution to express themselves through
their music. That doesnt mean we have to buy it!! The parents
of these children did not have to let the sort of thing into
their house. While I dont believe in cencorship in society, I
am all for cencorship in the home. I pick and choose what my
children listen to as well as what I listen to. I have
listened to Metal my entire life and My boys have listened to
what I listened to only because it was always being played by
me! But the music I
listen to, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, etc, didnt have hate
lyrics that music today has. My point is, that if those
parents would have thought about what their kids were
listening to, and cencored (gawd I hate that word but it fits
here..) the negative influences their children were into, this
horrible thing would not have happened. we as parents are not
able to control or protect society, only our children. If
everybody felt this way, their would not be so much negative
influence in the world.
Your Ideas are great ones and you really present them in a
passionate way Pangier, but I really beleive that they are
unrealistic. Almost communistic for lack of a better word. A
society that controls what influences us is not a free
society. And I choose freedom. whether its what most of us
percieve as moral freedom, or if I choose to worship Satan,
(Which I do not!!) Freedom is freedom.
I will contiue to do what I have been doing as far as
raising my children. But you have indeed made me think about
the worlds state of mind and I do agree it could use some
cleaning up! So I will do my part to try and make it a better
place to live in. Thanks for telling us how you feel Pangier,
its this reason that I love this cyber place. I long for more
grown up content on this board. I hope that we can be friends
and challenge each other on a regular basis. Who knows, maybe some of our
ideas will rub off on one another!
Thanks again.
--------------------
-Night Crawler- Knightsx5@home.com
-or visit me at my webpage- NightCrawler.com
Posts:
189 | From: Molten metal foundries where the
Midlands sound unfurled! | Registered: Jun 2001 |
Member # 144 | Status: Defender |
IP: Logged
| |
|
|
|
|
Pangier
Metal Man
|
posted 25 August 2001 14:29
Starbreaker
and Powerzlave. I don't believe you've read through the entire
thread. That point was made and addressed. I know this is a
long thread but please go back and read it as I believe you've
missed out on some good material.
quote:
Nightcrawler Wrote: A society that controls what
influences us is not a free society.
I'm not saying that the government should control our
influences. I'm saying that people should be responsible and
be held responsible for what they say. Much like not being
allowed to yell "Fire" in a crowded theatre.
Why is it so easy to see that concept and not this one?
In both cases there is harm involved. I admit that "intent"
is the difference between the two situations and maybe a
stumbling block for a lot of people. But if we understand that
in both cases the outcome cannot be anything but bad - If we
see and realize that by programming our children with promises
of Immortal power and pleasures for killing a virgin is wrong
and somebody should be held accountable for that, then we can
put an end to it.
I do not believe freedom of speech is inhibited here. No
more than demanding that someone not yell "fire" in a crowded
theatre. And please do not give me talk of artistic expression
because that does not fly with me. These actions at least
would be a blatant disregard for responsibility. I’d like to
put in force a law of responsibility upon actions of this sort
just as the law of not yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre.
quote:
Nightcrawler Wrote: I think the lyrics of the
Slayer song in question are indeed corrupt and just plain
appauling
I’m actually worried about the fact that you say that you
find the lyrical content of that Slayer song appalling and yet
you do not stand up against it.. Your actions (or non actions)
are no better than those people who close their blinds to
ignore cries of “rape” from a girl outside a window. If it
does not affect you directly, it’s not of your concern right?
quote:
Nightcrawler Wrote: But there are warning labels
on CD's that warn of explicit language and themes
Let’s be realistic and honest here. The warning labels do
little but hype the product inside. Sure some parents take
them seriously but the truth is that the labeling system is
governed and controlled by the record companies. It’s quite
useless. So I don’t buy the excuse of warning labels are the
band’s excuse for case dismissal.
Nightcrawler, I’m sure you’ve let your kids listen to songs
contained in CD's that had warning labels on them because the
content (although a bit rough around the edges) was not a big
deal. You knew your kids could handle it. A few swear words
here and there? No biggie right? What’s the difference between
one warning label and another? They’re all the same..
”Explicit Lyrics Inside” If Billy down the street can listen
to an album with explicit lyrics, why can’t my child? Looks
the same to any parent. But we know the difference is quite to
the contrary between what is on a Slayer album and what is on
a typical metal album with swear words..
So the only step would be to sift through each and every
thing our children are in contact with to make sure they are
what we want them to be influenced by. That’s ludicrous!!. We
all know that cannot be done.. With the corporations wanting
to make more money they’ve raised the cost of living to where
most families have to have both parents working. This is a
critical stab to our moral society. (Umm.. That’s another one
of my beefs but for now I’ll spare you that viewpoint )..
Teaching your children and giving them the right tools is
paramount in child development. Leaving them in a room full of
hate and murder should be the choice of the parent as well.
I think it’s apparent that we need a different approach.
You’re right when you said “...we have pushed the boundries of
this (freedom of speech) right for hundreds of years”. I
personally think it’s time for some common sense. I say hold
these people accountable for their actions of influence just
like Charles Manson was. If we do not, it will just get worse.
More will die and this needs not be.
The band Slayer is in many ways telling our children that
it is ok to murder for immortal power and pleasure. Our
children listen to these words over and over again programming
themselves for the destruction of others. I’ll admit that this
does not happen for each and every listener. But I think I’ve
proven that these messages are set in a very particular
programming nature.
In a day and age where we say people should be held
accountable for their actions, this is a demand people should
be making of one another. Dontcha think?
quote:
Nightcrawler Wrote: I realize the world as we know
it is going right down the perverbial toilet
You said it yourself..
It could have easily been your child killed. Those warning
labels do nothing for a grieving parent.
If it has not already, in the long run this situation
you're defending WILL affect you. As a society member, I
believe everyone should get involved and voice their opinion
to change to this situation rather than sit at home with your
blinds closed.. Personally my window is wide open and I’ve got
a small Hubbell telescope on my balcony
I know I’m hitting all of you with some very unique
viewpoints. I’ve appreciated your honest objections. I do
believe many of you are being honest with yourselves and not
just being a puppet mocking what others have said.
Thank you,
-Pangier
[ 25 August 2001: Message edited by: Pangier ]
--------------------
Serving all of your low ping gaming needs: http://www.chicagolanparty.com/
Browse unsigned bands worldwide: http://www.afternight.com/
Posts:
127 | From: Schaumburg, Illinois USA |
Registered: Jun 2001 | Member # 179 | Status:
Defender | IP: Logged
| | |